<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Urs Leimbgruber, and more</title>
	<atom:link href="http://andrewoliver.net/2009/06/urs-leimbgruber-and-more/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://andrewoliver.net/2009/06/urs-leimbgruber-and-more/</link>
	<description>Pianist, Composer, Arranger - Portland, OR</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 06 Sep 2010 00:41:36 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Andrew</title>
		<link>http://andrewoliver.net/2009/06/urs-leimbgruber-and-more/comment-page-1/#comment-21</link>
		<dc:creator>Andrew</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 07 Jul 2009 03:42:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://andrewoliver.wordpress.com/?p=162#comment-21</guid>
		<description>Good point, Andrew - I suppose Zappa was rather a master at that!  Still I wonder if having to sit through something waiting for something else is a problem in and of itself - it could quickly become the lame smorgasbord you describe though of course Zappa&#039;s personal touch was enough to hold it all together.  I wonder if the people who originally hated the gnarly modern chamber music eventually came around to like it?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Good point, Andrew &#8211; I suppose Zappa was rather a master at that!  Still I wonder if having to sit through something waiting for something else is a problem in and of itself &#8211; it could quickly become the lame smorgasbord you describe though of course Zappa&#8217;s personal touch was enough to hold it all together.  I wonder if the people who originally hated the gnarly modern chamber music eventually came around to like it?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: steph</title>
		<link>http://andrewoliver.net/2009/06/urs-leimbgruber-and-more/comment-page-1/#comment-20</link>
		<dc:creator>steph</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 06 Jul 2009 04:55:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://andrewoliver.wordpress.com/?p=162#comment-20</guid>
		<description>Serieses is a word?   Maybe it is just an avant garde way of expressing multiple series.  Hi Tom!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Serieses is a word?   Maybe it is just an avant garde way of expressing multiple series.  Hi Tom!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Andrew</title>
		<link>http://andrewoliver.net/2009/06/urs-leimbgruber-and-more/comment-page-1/#comment-19</link>
		<dc:creator>Andrew</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 29 Jun 2009 07:29:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://andrewoliver.wordpress.com/?p=162#comment-19</guid>
		<description>When it comes to being able to pursue avant-garde ends in a mainstream (or pop) context, my personal exemplar is Zappa. And I think he was &quot;successful,&quot; if we define that in terms of having the power to take on many of the ambitious projects he imagined (not all of them, though), because his music ends up being a kind of &quot;something for everybody&quot; experience, without feeling either like a cheesy unappetizing buffet, or like a cheap pander to multiple audiences.

So, for instance, the folks who liked the &quot;dumb rock songs&quot; could sit through the &quot;gnarly modern chamber music&quot; because they knew that there would be another &quot;dumb rock song&quot; sooner or later. Zappa&#039;s strong compositional personality connected everything as a coherent body of work, and that coherence was important, but there was enough of a sense of variety to appeal to multiple audiences.

Sorry, I know that was a bit of a tangent. Or was it? Anyway, cool post!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>When it comes to being able to pursue avant-garde ends in a mainstream (or pop) context, my personal exemplar is Zappa. And I think he was &#8220;successful,&#8221; if we define that in terms of having the power to take on many of the ambitious projects he imagined (not all of them, though), because his music ends up being a kind of &#8220;something for everybody&#8221; experience, without feeling either like a cheesy unappetizing buffet, or like a cheap pander to multiple audiences.</p>
<p>So, for instance, the folks who liked the &#8220;dumb rock songs&#8221; could sit through the &#8220;gnarly modern chamber music&#8221; because they knew that there would be another &#8220;dumb rock song&#8221; sooner or later. Zappa&#8217;s strong compositional personality connected everything as a coherent body of work, and that coherence was important, but there was enough of a sense of variety to appeal to multiple audiences.</p>
<p>Sorry, I know that was a bit of a tangent. Or was it? Anyway, cool post!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: TBG</title>
		<link>http://andrewoliver.net/2009/06/urs-leimbgruber-and-more/comment-page-1/#comment-18</link>
		<dc:creator>TBG</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 28 Jun 2009 15:06:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://andrewoliver.wordpress.com/?p=162#comment-18</guid>
		<description>I think our last SoS tour showed us that non-musicians can handle our music and even enjoy it. We had lots of positive reactions from people who had never been to a show like this, or who were involved in a totally different music scene. However, my mother still hates it.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think our last SoS tour showed us that non-musicians can handle our music and even enjoy it. We had lots of positive reactions from people who had never been to a show like this, or who were involved in a totally different music scene. However, my mother still hates it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
